Danny, In the defense of labs, it isn't unusual for one treatment to nearly eliminate one or two bugs only to have another opportunistic bug that's resistant to "Treatment #1" begin vigorously invading.... thus requiring a different or broader "Treatment #2."
Sure, there' some bad techs just wanting a paycheck... accuracy be damned... and plenty of good techs doing the job they love and doing it well. Is this any different from ANY other work environment? Think about an auto mechanic, a computr tech, a Voc. Rehab counselor... some great, some good, some mediocre and some awful. So, you are right about one thing, for sure: > --- WE DO NEED THEM BUT LIKE ALL JOBS --- THEY HAVE GOOD WORKERS THAT CARE > AND OTHERS THAT JUST WANT A PAYCHECK AND COULD CARE LESS... But, to say "...COULD CARE LESS IF YOU SUFFER OR DIE," is pretty extreme. I've used several labs, get copies of all my results (and check) and VERY rarely have problems that aren't correctly treated the first time. Best regards, --Tod ---- Danny Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .... THEN OTHER TIMES DIAGNOSS ME WITH SOMETHING--THEN AS I'M BEING TREATED, > CHECK BLOOD AND URINE AGAIN AND GET A TOTAL DIFFERENT READING AND CHANGE THE > DRUGS ONCE AGAIN! > --- WE DO NEED THEM BUT LIKE ALL JOBS --- THEY HAVE GOOD WORKERS THAT CARE > AND OTHERS THAT JUST WANT A PAYCHECK AND COULD CARE LESS IF YOU SUFFER OR DIE. > > DAN H. >
