In a message dated 3/4/2009 10:04:08 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Excerpt  from Henry Claypool's written testimony to the committee on CCA and  
CLASS.  If you go  to
http://aging.senate.gov/hearing_detail.cfm?id=309028&;

and  scroll down you will see a list of people testifying.
If you click on  Henry's name you can get his full testimony, but here is the 
section on  CCA:

" To strengthen our country's financing for LTSS and increase the  
availability and
accessibility of community living services, I  recommend that Congress work 
with
President Obama to enact  comprehensive LTSS reforms such as those envisioned
in the Community Choice  Act and the CLASS Act
1. Advance the Community Choice Act
As you know,  Senator Harkin has long sponsored legislation that would 
address
the  institutional bias in Medicaid and give those in a need a real choice  of
community-based or institutional services. The most recent iteration of  this
legislation- the Community Choice Act - would advance this vital aim  by
providing states with additional federal resources to make community  living
services a mandatory part of the Medicaid benefit. In so doing, it  would 
offer
people that need such assistance a real choice between  living in an 
institution or
their community-enabling states to better  meet their civil rights 
obligations
under the Americans with  Disabilities Act to provide people with 
disabilities
with services -  including Medicaid LTSS - in the most integrated setting
appropriate to  their needs.
The cost to the federal government associated with this  proposal has been 
cited
as a barrier to its enactment in the past.  There is evidence, however, that 
the
original estimates relied on  assumptions that are now out-dated. By using
recently compiled data  regarding states' spending on personal assistance
services, a more refined  estimate from the Congressional Budget Office may
allow policy makers to  better weigh the benefits associated with allocating
resources toward  making access to community-based personal assistance
services an  entitlement
If the estimated cost of the Community Choice Act continues to  discourage
legislators from adopting this approach to address the need to  make more
community-based personal assistance services available through  the Medicaid
Page 6
program, an alternative approach should be included  as part of health 
reform.
Such provisions could include providing  financial incentives to states to 
increase
the availability of  community-based personal assistance services and 
supports
over a five-  to ten-year period. The federal government could establish a 
series  of
annual benchmarks to set a target for each state to measure progress  toward
providing a level of personal assistance services that would support  an 
increased
number of beneficiaries to live in their homes and  communities.
Providing, for example, a states with a modest increase in  their FMAP over a
prolonged five- to ten-year period could help advance  four key objectives:
.. It could help states to measurably reduce and  gradually eliminate service
access disparities that currently exist within  states, across different 
groups
of beneficiaries, and throughout the  country.
.. It could provide states with a federal funding commitment to  expand
access to such services and to sustain such access even during one  or more
economic downturn. This is necessary to address the chilling effect  that
the countercyclical nature of Medicaid has upon state policy  makers'
decision-making that affects community living services in both good  times
and bad.
.. It could provide states with the time they require to  rebalance their LTSS
systems and begin to realize some of the cost  efficiencies and savings that
can result from doing so.
.. Such an  approach also could provide the states and the federal
government the time  needed to experiment with and arrive at a consensus
on what a fair and  sustainable division of labor and funding responsibility
for Medicaid LTSS  should be.
States' participation in such a program could be voluntary.  However, if a 
state
refused to participate or take good-faith effort to  make meaningful progress 
in
rebalancing its LTSS system, it could be  compelled to comply with the
integration requirements of the ADA and the  Olmstead decision." 

NATIONAL ADAPT MAILING LIST - Adapt Community  Choice Act List 
http://www.adapt.org




**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)

Reply via email to