LOL , Eric-- glad to hear they are not X or XXX rated. Dan*
________________________________ From: Eric W Rudd <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, November 18, 2011 10:32:59 PM Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Touchy Topic it's not even rated 'R' 'my boys' are PG...promise Eric W Rudd [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- >From: Lissette Whitehead >To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] >Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 10:29 PM >Subject: RE: [QUAD-L] Touchy Topic > > >I wouldn't mind a code word, but come on, is that really necessary? aren't we >all adults here? >Ok, so Rated 'R' maybe? LOL > > > >Lissette Whitehead >1177 Broadway Suite #4 >Chula Vista, CA 91911 >www.lissettesgoaltowalk.synthasite.com >www.lwgripgloves.com > > > > ________________________________ From: [email protected] >To: [email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: RE: [QUAD-L] Touchy Topic >Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:38:13 -0500 > > >It would also be possible for us to have some sort of a code word or symbol to >include in the subject line (e.g. SEX) so that those who wanted to avoid the >discussions would either ignore the posts or automatically delete them. > >From:Don Price [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 6:54 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [QUAD-L] Touchy Topic > >Pardon the pun in the subject line, but I was wondering how we might go about >having a very frank discussion about sexuality and SCI online. > > >I know that some people on this list would be interested in the subject of >sexuality while others would not, and might even find it offensive. We lost a >subscriber yesterday, I suspect because we got a bit too graphic about 'the >boys.' So, I'm thinking this is not the best place to discuss this topic. >Maybe there's a forum that already exists for the topic of SCI and sex? > >Is it possible to start a sub-list of people on here who wanted to have a >candid >discussion about this topic, knowing that there is the probabilty of offensive >language or information in such a discussion? It's an important topic and I'm >guessing more than a few would be interested. > >Any thoughts [without getting graphic]? >Don.
