Please send a letter. All you have to do is fill out your information and  
the letter is already written for you. This is very important to urge the  
Department of Labor to not implement these changes. 
Thank you,
Dana
In a message dated 2/21/2012 12:13:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

    
 
BACKGROUND   
The Department of Labor  (DOL) has proposed changes in federal labor rules 
that, although  well-intentioned, will have a negative impact on people with 
disabilities and  most seriously impact people who have the most 
significant disabilities who  rely on Medicaid home and community based 
services to be 
independent.   
Labor advocates have  urged people to support these rules which are 
intended to assure that  attendants get paid minimum wage and are paid 
time-and-a-half for overtime  work. The disability community recognizes the 
invaluable 
role that attendants  play in supporting the independence of people with 
disabilities and has  advocated for increased funding for attendant services to 
improve wages,  however the way DOL is implementing this rule change will 
have a serious  negative impact on people with disabilities and promote 
unwanted  institutionalization. 
Please TAKE  ACTION before the comment deadline of February 27,  2012. 
TAKE  ACTION 
There are several ways  to TAKE ACTION on this important  issue. 
1. Submit comments on the  web.  ADAPT has worked with the Center for 
Disability Rights to  set up a system online to make this process easy for you. 
Go  to: _http://ly.adapt.org/dol_ (http://ly.adapt.org/dol)    
When you submit your  comments, be sure to edit and personalize the body of 
the message.  Your comments to the Department of  Labor will first be sent 
to the Center for Disability Rights who will forward  them by the deadline 
to DOL.   
2. Mail written comments directly to  the US Department of  Labor.  Send 
written comments  to: 
Mary Ziegler,  Director 
Division of  Regulations, Legislation, and Interpretation 
Wage and Hour  Division 
U.S.  Department of Labor 
Room S–3502/ RIN  1235–AA05 
200 Constitution Avenue  NW. 
Washington, DC  20210 
Please TAKE ACTION before the  comment deadline of February 27, 2012. 
DETAILED POLICY  IMPLICATIONS 
Most notably, people  with disabilities could face unwanted 
institutionalization as a result of  implementing these proposed rules.    
    *   Increasing the  cost of home and community based services by 
requiring overtime pay,  without increasing the Medicaid rates or raising the 
Medicaid caps for  available funding, will result in a reduction in hours of 
personal  assistance, forcing some people with  disabilities into unwanted 
institutionalization.  
    *   Requiring  minimum wage payments for overnight assistance may raise 
the cost of  serving individuals above established Medicaid caps, resulting 
in people  with significant disabilities either going without needed 
assistance or  being forced into unwanted  institutionalization.
    *   The proposed  DOL change will limit the availability of family and 
friends as paid  attendants in consumer directed personal assistance 
programs.  Reducing the availability of this  vital component of the attendant 
workforce threatens the independence of  Americans with disabilities.
The DOL also  significantly mischaracterizes consumer directed services.  
DOL describes consumer directed  services “as a ‘grey market;’ that contains 
an element of ‘over-the-back-fence  network of women [who are] usually 
untrained, unscreened, and unsupervised,  but more affordable without an agency’
s fee, less constrained by regulations  and hired through personal 
recommendation.’  The term ‘grey market’ is sometimes  used to suggest that at 
least 
some of these private arrangements are designed  to avoid applicable labor 
laws…” 
DOL notes that “There is  no consolidated source of data on state 
consumer-directed programs” even  though there are several resources within the 
disability community, and DOL  fails to assess the impact that the proposed 
changes will have on that system  for providing services and supports to people 
with disabilities.   
It is also likely that  the proposed changes will not significantly improve 
the lives of  attendants.  Because Medicaid and  Medicare rates are not 
being increased to cover the additional cost associated  with these changes, 
home care agencies will limit the hours attendants can  work, forcing 
attendants who currently to work for multiple agencies in order  to match their 
current standard of living. 
The necessity to balance efforts to enhance  workers’ wages and benefits 
with the needs of people with disabilities was  identified and addressed in 
Guiding Principles which were developed between  SEIU and disability 
advocates.   According to those Guiding Principles, signed on November 16, 
2011, “As  
a general principle, enhancements to workers’ wages and benefits shall be 
paid  for through increased funding.”   The DOL proposal does not do this.   
KEY POINTS FOR MAILED  COMMENTS 
Although I want  attendants to have good wages, I am deeply concerned that 
establishing a  requirement that attendants be paid overtime in this manner 
will negatively  impact people with significant disabilities and their 
ability to live in the  Most Integrated Setting.    
    *   Increasing the  cost of home and community based services by 
requiring overtime and overtime  pay without increasing the Medicaid rates or 
raising the Medicaid caps for  available funding will result in a reduction in 
hours of personal  assistance, forcing some people into unwanted 
institutionalization.  
    *   Requiring  minimum wage payments for overnight assistance may make 
raise the cost of  those services above established Medicaid caps, resulting 
in people going  without needed assistance or being forced into unwanted  
institutionalization, and the proposed DOL change will limit the  
availability of family and friends as paid attendants in consumer directed  
personal 
assistance programs.   Reducing the availability of this vital component of 
the attendant  workforce threatens the independence of Americans with  
disabilities.
    *   According to DOL’s own analysis, the  proposed rules have the 
potential to increase the rate of  institutionalization of people with 
disabilities.  
Finally, I am concerned  that the proposed changes will not significantly 
improve the lives of  attendants.  Because Medicaid and  Medicare rates are 
not being increased to cover the additional cost associated  with these 
changes, home care agencies simply will limit the hours attendants  can work, 
forcing attendants to work for multiple agencies in order to match  their 
current standard of living. 
I urge the Department  of Labor to postpone implementation of these 
proposed changes until it has  worked with disability and labor advocates to 
develop an approach that can  enhance workers’ wages and benefits without 
eroding 
the availability of long  term services and supports. 




Reply via email to