On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:22:18AM -0800, Dinesh Dutt wrote: > On 12/08/2014 05:38 AM, David Lamparter wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:04:47AM +0800, Feng Lu wrote: > >> The main discussion is around which is better, N-in-1 or 1-for-1? > >> While, many comments indicate the preference with support from only > >> experiences. > > My question is: why not both? > > I agree, I believe I said the same thing earlier,
Yeah, I think at this point it's just confusion and we're failing to notice we're all agreeing :D Anyway. This is why I started looking at RIB changes in the Cumulus tree (and why I split up the multi instance stuff into patches) - I wanted to get an overview of what other RIB changes are on the horizon. I would like to do a block of RIB changes: - IPv6 ECMP - VRFs - nexthop tracking - multi-instance - redist-table - route tags - sourcedest - MRIB We may have to split this up in 2 blocks ;) (Did you see my other E-Mail requesting that you split up the NHT stuff?) -David _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
