Why would you need to delay packet sending in EIGRP by a random amount? Typically one stops another threads execution through an agreed upon communication method. I'm not aware of a command to use to remotely suspend another thread without using the agreed upon communication method.
In any event before any specific recommendations about what can be done, it would be nice to have a more detailed description of the problem that you are facing. donald On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Jan Janovic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello community! > > Is it possible to somehow pause specific thread in Quagga for several > miliseconds while not affecting work of other threads? They would continue > their jobs. I'm just thinking loudly. Maybe it's stupid consideration. > > I need to address one situation in our new EIGRP daemon, when it would be > best to delay packet sending for a little, but random amount of time...and > then decide what next. It's possible that in a meanwhile, when thread is > stopped, we will receive another specific packet and the next step in > previous stopped thread will be slightly different. > > I can provide you with more specific information if needed. > > Thanks for info. > > Best regards > Jan Janovic > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
