So, before there was just one ORF plist for any AFI?

By splitting it so there's per-AFI orfs, are there any configuration breakage issues?

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, David Lamparter wrote:

BGP ORF prefix lists are in a separate namespace; this was previously
hooked up with a special-purpose AFI value.  This is a little kludgy for
extension, hence this splits it off.

Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <[email protected]>
---
bgpd/bgp_fsm.c    |   2 +-
bgpd/bgp_packet.c |   6 +--
bgpd/bgpd.c       |   2 +-
lib/plist.c       | 149 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
lib/plist.h       |   5 +-
5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bgpd/bgp_fsm.c b/bgpd/bgp_fsm.c
index 112c34a..d261bb5 100644
--- a/bgpd/bgp_fsm.c
+++ b/bgpd/bgp_fsm.c
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ bgp_stop (struct peer *peer)

regards,
--
Paul Jakma      [email protected]  @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, not the fountainheads.

_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to