Dave Taht <[email protected]> writes: > It does great harm for both present and future babel contributors for > there to be a license different from the mainline code. It also > impedes the standardization efforts in the ietf to have disjoint and > out of date implementations of the core protocol, which may one day > also be forked into more proprietary codebases, especially given how > few are capable or have time to work on it.
Convenience to people who want to use code has no bearing on what is proper. Removing all the GPL licenses from Linux would make it easier for people to create proprietary derived works, and surely you would not suggest that to be a reasonable course of action. The question remains what's legally appropriate, in terms of respecting the license of the code from Zebra, and the social norms within and open source project.
pgpor6b5Wz2hW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
