On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:37:09PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, David Lamparter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 03:54:28PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > >> The original patch-set was presented as not adding any obstacles to the > >> more isolated, multiple-process approach. However, it does seem to add at > >> least one - the single ZServ instance for all. > > > > bgp/ospf/... processes. There's no change there, in fact this works > > right now with bind mounting /var/run/quagga. > > Different thing.
Er... no...? > If we add a VRF ID to ZServ, how would we then later split up zebra into > per-VRF instances? How would that be different from running zebra in the netns? (Ignoring config glue and additions to inter-VRF information exchange) -David _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
