On 6/9/2015 4:26 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Paul Jakma wrote:
- /* Set table number. */
+ /* Set table number. XXX? Make sense with VRFs? */
client->rtm_table = zebrad.rtm_table_default;
Which reminds me, shouldn't the old table stuff that never worked be
killed off? Or am confused and is this for something else?
The current "table" command seems to be more of a global state
controlling what is the "current" kernel table Quagga is communicating
with by default. This still makes sense in a VRF-aware world and the
same semantics can still be honored. However, since this never worked
well, killing it off might not be a bad idea especially that VRF should
be able to provide a way to control a specific table.
Regards,
Jafar
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
