1260,
anyone to ack it?
http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1260/
Donald said: "Looks good, I'm going to use it."
Donald?
Should'it it be ack? just obvious logs to be included.
1261, 1262,
http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1261/
>> I feel it should be resubmitted with __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ to be
replaced by __func__
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Names.html
dropped from patchwork:
http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1263/
"I'll be sending a patch for the problem here shortly."
1264,
http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1264/
What's the status?
Note that for a same serie of patch, a version number and changelog
annotations are helpful:
$ git send-email -1 --subject-prefix 'PATCH v2' --annotate
--to [email protected] --cc <everybody discussing the patch>
--in-reply-to <Message-ID of the previous patch>
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
