On Sep 15, 2015, at 5:44 AM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, what about requiring that where a command is modified and that command > has documentation already, that the documentation is updated? > > Out-of-date and hence misleading documentation is perhaps more annoying than > none.
Agreed. Potentially *way* more. However, who is going to check? I guess, since you're doing the committing, that would be you (& other maintainers). So if you're willing to eat that additional overhead, I'm all for this. /a _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
