Alexis - We haven't explicitly quantified anything although, Memory utilization is probably a bit better since we are no longer storing nexthops on a per RIB basis. When I have done perf on our large test beds(100's of neighbors 100k+ routes) it's almost never anything but inefficient data structure choice that dominate the cpu in bgp.
donald On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Alexis Rosen < [email protected]> wrote: > This looks great. Long past time for it. But I'm curious - have you > profiled the change in CPU and memory? I'm less concerned about CPU > (obviously going to be a big win) than memory. I'm happy to pay it for the > CPU gain, just curious about how expensive it will be. > > /a
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
