On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Martin Winter wrote:
Sorry. From what I understood is when Paul did the proposed branch, this
was more of a selection of candidate patches - but limited testing only
and mainly as a base for discussion on what would go in.
Once the decision there was done and it went into an accepted tree, then
this was when the main interest was to get the set of select patches
working.
At least this was my understanding of the process. Might be wrong…
That was what I was doing, yes.
Some systematicish process is used to queue up patches to a 'proposed'
branch (e.g. the first X patches I am capable of handling, submitted since
last patch that made it in the last round). This is "proposed by
contributors for review".
From that set some may have discussion, need rejigging, etc. Based on that
they get sorted into 'accepted' (preliminary), 'deferred' and 'rejected'.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Assume a virtue, if you have it not. -William Shakespeare
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
