Martin - Before you narrow down a specific patch that might be causing the issue...
I've been contemplating working through our entire patch set and exposing it through the take-X branches. I can't imagine we haven't already fixed the crash you are seeing( and I'm looking for that by hand now ). In addition I think you've provided enough of a clue for me to narrow down the problem to the actual bit of code and to find our fix. donald On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Martin Winter < [email protected]> wrote: > Han, > > On 17 Nov 2015, at 4:27, Han Coumans wrote: > > > Dear Martin, Donald, Quagga devlist, > > > > > > From CI's RIPng RFC test we learn that even without a new patch (from the > > Cumulus Mega patch set 'Take 2') for RIPng it's possible to have 10 new > > failures, making a total of 17 (one is an 'unpredict'). > > Keep in mind to look at the differences. The cumulus mege set is based on > top of the last round (accepted 4) - so the main thing is to compare to > this one. > > And to give kudos to Cumulus: There are actually quite a few past failures > which show up as fixed. > > For the failed ones, my experience is that a single issue (i.e. in zebra) > might impact many tests. I’m still working through the failures and will > post whenever I find a specific one (and can explain the exact issue or > commit or how to reproduce). But it will take some time with such a large > set. > > Regards, > > - Martin Winter > > > > That will be an interesting fix. > > > > > > Thanks for your CI, Martin. > > > > > > Regards, > > Han Coumans >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
