On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Daniel Walton wrote:
>
> FWIW IOS has used 0 for iBGP and 5 for eBGP since ~2004.  We (cisco at the
>> time) never had any complaints when we changed to these values (they were
>> both 30s before). The only reason we didn't do 0 for eBGP was because
>> dampening was still used a fair amount back then (not so much now).
>>
>
> With the MRAIs set to 0 you can get some bursts of path hunting but they
>> tend to be short lived because bgp ends up converging so fast (sub-second
>> is typical).  Given the lack of complaints when the iBGP timer was changed
>> to 0, I don't think increased path hunting is much of a concern. Path
>> hunting is worse as meshiness increases and an iBGP core tends to be more
>> meshy and eBGP connections.  I think we could use 0 for both without any
>> path hunting issues.
>>
>
> Interesting.
>
> I'd probably keep eBGP !0, just for the sake of being conservative for
> now. BGP can produce /many/ rounds of messages, and the literature shows
> that as you decrease the MRAI past the optimum the number of messages and
> go toward 0 the number of messages increases very quickly again (but
> linearly). Even just 1s, just to avoid causing bad storms somewhere between
> different ASes.
>
>
I can get on board with 0 for iBGP and 1s for eBGP :)  Maybe someday we can
look into this draft as a means of making it 0 for ebgp:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-keyupate-bgp-rcn-00

Daniel



> Path hunting is indeed made much more worse by high MRAIs.
>
> iBGP, sure go to 0. Same operator, and the network will be smaller in size
> compared to the Internet.
>
> Important bit: we're all agreed the standards specified values and
> Quagga's current defaults are _way_ too high. ;)
>
> regards,
> --
> Paul Jakma      [email protected]  @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
> Fortune:
> Romeo wasn't bilked in a day.
>                 -- Walt Kelly, "Ten Ever-Lovin' Blue-Eyed Years With Pogo"
>
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to