We tested this code with 300 peers and the cpu for bgp was under 5%. We don't have access to low end devices, although we do run on some slower power-pc's. Have either of you actually tested this and we have actual data to back this up?
donald On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/12/2015 01:13, Martin Winter wrote: > > What do others feel about this? > > it's going to break things. > > > As a workaround I would suggest users to specifically configure a > non-default > > keepalive/holdtime (i.e. “timers bgp 60 181”) > > sensible. > > Nick > > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
