Why not use '!' instead of 'exit'. I assume the goal is to signal that we are done route-map input.
I would prefer that we come up with a methodology to handle this for all end blocks, instead of just for route-maps. donald On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> wrote: > The last route-map written to config should have an "exit" at the end to > return to the main node from route-map processing. > > Signed-off-by: Lou Berger <lber...@labn.net> > Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equi...@opensourcerouting.org> > --- > lib/routemap.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/routemap.c b/lib/routemap.c > index 7302e23..116c8bd 100644 > --- a/lib/routemap.c > +++ b/lib/routemap.c > @@ -1288,6 +1288,8 @@ route_map_config_write (struct vty *vty) > > write++; > } > + if (!first) > + vty_out (vty, " exit%s", VTY_NEWLINE); > return write; > } > > -- > 2.1.3 > > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
