On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 21:15:13 -0500 Donald Sharp <[email protected]> wrote:
> My original comment still stands: > > I agree that your use of finer grained RT_SCOPE_LINK and > RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE is a good thing. My only real problem with the > patch was the removal of this line: > > - resolved_hop->flags |= > NEXTHOP_FLAG_ONLINK; > > Put it back and I believe we would be ok. But that was the whole point of this patch. To get rid of this line. So we have regular routes in kernel and not 'onlink' ones. Though, thinking more. There might be implications if user configured policy routing on kernel. On the other hand, this is required if in future we want kernel side route failover (for minimal packet loss) when e.g. a interface link goes down. /Timo _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
