David -

Thanks for agreeing to present at the monthly meeting.  Can't wait to see
what you have.

thanks!

donald

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, David Lamparter <[email protected]
> wrote:

> My plan is to present this at (or directly after, if people want to
> split the topic) the next Quagga monthly meeting.  I have some half-done
> slides that I'd like to finish, and it might also be possible to push
> out some code.
>
> Paul, from your text below ("HPEN are about to start working on this."),
> do you have a time constraint that wouldn't be met with that timeline?
>
> FWIW, it's built around pretty much the thoughts you outline below, and
> then some.  The code is working in a 3rd party setup, but I have
> medium-scale adjustments queued up (based on more "lessons learned").
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> -David
>
> P.S.: Yes, I gave no response at all on what we actually did.  I
> strongly prefer giving a thought-out introduction to the interface over
> starting to pluck away at the design from a random angle with half of
> the picture missing...
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:30:00PM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, David Lamparter wrote:
> > >
> > >>  As for this discussion, the approach that seemed most fruitful in my
> view
> > >>  was to push transaction functionality outside of Quagga. There's no
> > >>  advantage to having it inside, since when it's properly modularised
> it
> > >>  looks like this:
> > >>
> > >>  CLI             ----> transaction code ---->  settings API
> > >>  (or other config)
> > >
> > > The key thing is the API, want to publish it?
> >
> > I've had some preliminary discussions and investigations on this.
> >
> > It seems there are 2 paths:
> >
> > - Define a structured storage layer and an API both for access (r/w) of
> >    objects in some structured way, and notifications
> >
> > - Annotate existing objects with the data needed to introspect them
> >    (and maybe find them).
> >
> > The former might be how you'd do things if starting from scratch. The
> > downside of that way is that there's a lot of existing code to change.
> > It'd be a very big and disruptive change, and no doubt the churn would
> > introduce bugs on the routing side.
> >
> > The latter would be easier to fit in to the existing code. Code reading
> > from annotated objects might need little to no modification. The downside
> > of course is it's less encapsulated, so notifications would depend on the
> > writer initiating. The latter could also accommodate a more encapsulated
> > state/storage/settings API.
> >
> > I've played with some of the latter and the 'annotations' or
> introspection
> > objects can be added in a relatively type-safe way, using similar "encode
> > info into the C symbol space" tricks as in the memory patches you had.
> >
> > HPEN are about to start working on this. If there's existing work to
> build
> > on, collaborate with, and iterate on, that'd be great - if it's available
> > and the other parties are interested. ?? Otherwise, we will start
> > exploring the latter approach, implementation wise.
> >
> > Our aim is to able to support an OPS like architecture, where state
> > (routing state as well as config state) can be easily externalised and
> > modified.. It seems we're agreed that would have a lot of benefits. HPEN
> > are, of course, particularly interested in being able to slot-in an
> > RFC7047 like protocol to/from an external DB (i.e. the client protocol
> > side to an OpenVSwitch OVSDB).
> >
> > regards,
> > --
> > Paul Jakma, HPE Networking, Advanced Technology Group
> > Fortune:
> > He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of
> wisdom.
> >               -- J.R.R. Tolkien
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Quagga-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quagga-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to