No? :) It's not clear to me at all that:
(a) allot of people use telnet over vtysh (b) that they've read the code to know that there is a restricted functionality that only exists for bgp (c) and read the code to implement the functionality (d) that people are logging in and only giving themselves limited permissions (e) that we are not working towards fixing performance issues that are listed as a main cause of needing this functionality. Having said all of that I'm not sure this is worth the argument over this code. I can just withdraw this part of the patches, I'm more interested in the ENABLE_NODE and VIEW_NODE code changes... donald On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Paul Jakma <p...@jakma.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Paul Jakma wrote: > > So, the question is, does anyone use or need the unauthenticated bgpd >> telnet feature? It could be hard to answer that... >> > > And these definitely exist, e.g. route-views. I can't tell exactly if > they're using 'anonymous restricted' but it does seem some commands aren't > there. So in principle at least this is a desired and used feature. > > Does that resolve the issue? > > regards, > -- > Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A > Fortune: > The worst part of valor is indiscretion. >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
