On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 15:19 +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > Good, I hope Paul is working unnumbered too? > I'm leaving unnumbered to you and Cumulus to work out. :) > > My bias would be towards giving your patches priority, and then letting > Cumulus then do their stuff on top, assuming both of you have patches > against recent HEAD. Otherwise, whichever patches apply. Donald has > stuff in his take-3, which I assume is the Cumulus way.
I do not have any unnumbered patches, I do have issues(already communicated) with some of the unnumbered patches in this mega series. Since then there has been no progress. Up to you if you want to apply them anyway, my NACK really doesn't mean much theses days as I am not working at all with upstream Q ATM. Jocke _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
