On 17 Apr 2016, at 13:19, jafar wrote:
I think I'm supposed to resubmit this patch in a new email, right?

Yes, would be preferred.

Is it better to submit patches as attachments, or inline?
BTW. how do we avoid an error like this, that I see often on the list but don't know why it happens?

In general it’s your email client screwing with the format of the patch.
The suggest rule is to NOT use a traditional email client and use
“git send-email …” instead. This should correctly preserve the format.

Regards,

- Martin Winter


On 2016-04-15 18:40, [email protected] wrote:
Continous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
This is an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback, feel free to email
Martin Winter <[email protected]>.

Patches applied :
  Patchwork 1897: http://patchwork.quagga.net/patch/1897
       [quagga-dev,15056] Fix ospfd: use the correct index for pseudo
neighbors on p2p/v links
Tested on top of Git : 86c5d2e (as of 20160315.231717 UTC)
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/QUAGGA-QPWORK-269/


Get source and apply patch from patchwork: Failed
----------------
Applying Patchwork patch 1897
------------------------------------
patching file ospfd/ospf_interface.c
patch: **** malformed patch at line 57: *ifp, struct prefix *p)

Regards,
  NetDEF/OpenSourceRouting Continous Integration (CI) System

---
OpenSourceRouting.org is a project of the Network Device Education Foundation, For more information, see www.netdef.org and www.opensourcerouting.org
For questions in regards to this CI System, contact Martin Winter,
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to