Hello Paul, Le 25/04/2016 12:05, Paul Jakma a écrit : > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Olivier Dugeon wrote: > >> Hello Donald, Paul >> >> What's about the Traffic Engineering patches I just update and submitted >> today ? > >> Paul create a volatile/lls-te branch to review and update my original >> patches against 0.99.24.1. I continue to work with Paul on that proposing >> some improvements and corrections. The last version I sent today was the >> latest version of this branch update to latest release. > >> Can you add it to the proposed/8 branch too ? I think the review could be >> quick as the delta with the volatile/lls-te is small. > > I've not looked at this specific patch set in detail, but I don't intend to > hold it up either. Hum, not sure to understand. Let me clarify to avoid any confusion.
Originally I submit a patch against 0.99.23 that have been reviewed by F. Lu. Once taking into account all remarks I publish a new version against 0.99.24. At that moment, you take the floor and create the volatile/lls-te branch to proposed some modification (in particular for the ZBus exchange and the CLI). On top of that, I send some small patches to enhance/correct this branch. However, this branch was not merge into the master. So, after the publication of latest release, I start to take all patches from the volatile/lls-te branch + the small ones I produce and re-apply the whole on a fresh 1.0.20160315 release. This give me a new set of patches against the latest version that I publish last week. So, I agree that the volatile/ll-te branch could be remove. Concerning the latest patch I submit, the code review has been already performed and thus, could be considered as ready for inclusion. Regards, Olivier > regards,
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
