On Fri, 20 May 2016, David Lamparter wrote:
The event most likely to change my opinion on this is being presented
with an actual real-world setup that sees breakage from this. From
the way this bug works, I guess it'd need to be a Quagga-only
production network.
The concern was with mixed behaviour networks.
By just flipping the default, we may then create mixed behaviour
networks which otherwise wouldn't have been.
If the driving concern is the risk of routing loops for users, then we
should avoid exposing ones not exposed currently with any change, as
much as possible.
I.e., in fixing the issue for those affected, it would be good not to
impose it on those not affected currently.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Confession is good for the soul, but bad for the career.
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
