Olivier,
On 15 Jun 2016, at 23:47, Olivier Dugeon wrote:
Hi Donald, all,
Concerning the Maintainer document, I add a comment I would discuss on
the mailing list.
Is there room to define a new role named 'Reviewer' that stand between
contributor and maintainer. I mean volunteer who could help maintainer
to review code, that have some write access to patchwork (or
equivalent tool if we change) to ACk/Nack patches and limited access
to git i.e. only write access on dedicated branch as suggested in the
Quagga process document.
Comments ?
I would suggest to just edit the document and add it. This way we’ll
remember to discuss it during the meeting.
- Martin
Le 14/06/2016 18:55, Donald Sharp a écrit :
Next Tuesday we have the normal monthly meeting. If you have
anything that you would like to discuss please let me know so I can
add it to the agenda.
I'd like to discuss and vote on the 3 documents:
Maintainer:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19DZcT0cJUSYxVIFenHvGFhLLUmLTRFHuMNZcI7aUNGA/edit?usp=sharing
Tools:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s_EbbXwqWPmfOg6ArgKmEMm_iv0vwGvJs-7ZG4yFKb4/edit?usp=sharing
Quagga Process:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xYrpTKYDvK23BCxXP-dbE6nOuvBxbGIilNLfVkI3j-I/edit?usp=sharing
Please take the time to read/discuss.
thanks!
donald
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
