On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Walton wrote:
but yeah for the patch you are looking at I think your change would be fine.
Ok, will add that tweak. It's easier to start with fewer behavioural
options and expand if needs be than vice versa.
Yeah, sure. So we have to keep that behaviour on the base command of
course.
Just wondering if we need to offer both "all must be private first" and
"act on any" for the new 'replace' case?
So only offer "replace" if "all" was specified?
Yes.
Is there ever a reason where you'd want:
- Replace all the ASes, but only if every AS is private
- Replace nothing if any AS is not private
?
That'd mean that, say, 1_2_3_64512_64513 would have nothing replaced and
went out with private ASes? Is that useful?
regards,
--
Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
One good turn asketh another.
-- John Heywood
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
