On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Paul Jakma wrote:

+Governance {#sec:governance}
+==========
+
+The governance of Quagga is currently in flux.
+
+Quagga was forked from GNU Zebra by Paul Jakma, who holds the domain name.
+Governance was soon devolved to a collective group, the maintainers.
+
+Governance at this moment is again fully in the hands of Paul Jakma, to be
+recast.
+
+Holding of project assets
+-------------------------
+
+One or more mature, independent trustees, with technical and free software
+experience, will be appointed as the executor(s) for key assets of the
+project to ensure continuity, such as the domain name.
+
+Should a corporate vehicle ever be created to hold such assets it __must__:
+
+* Publish up to date accounts on a regular business.
+* Generally operate openly and transparently.
+* Have control distributed, with a significant degree of control held
+  independent of any contributors with business interests in the software.
+* Carry out no other business itself that may be seen to conflict or compete
+  with the business of others in the community.
+* Have all officers disclose all interests that could be
+  seen to have a bearing on the project, as far as is reasonable.
+
+It not clear at this time that the overheads and potential liabilities of
+such a vehicle would be appropriate for this project.  These principles
+should though still be applied, where possible, to any non-corporate body
+formed around the project.

Oh, others in the past (before the lovely manoeuvrings of '15/'16) have made a good case for SFConservancy.org. Though:

a) It doesn't avoid having to sort out project side governance, to
   interface with SFConservancy.

b) One other issue I had was that any long-term assets (e.g. domain
   names) would end up stuck under US law pretty much forever more. I
   would probably prefer a more local jurisdiction.

I read recently of a UK CIC (a type of UK corporate body required to act in the public-interest) with similar aims to SFConservancy:

        https://publicsoftware.eu/

(via:
  https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/713073/fd6db0a111ab8b7e/
  / https://lwn.net/Articles/713073/ )

Maybe an option. Assuming a community rebuilds again anyway...

regards,
--
Paul Jakma | [email protected] | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A
Fortune:
Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do it himself.
                -- A.H. Weiler

_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev

Reply via email to