hi Pavel - this is great news. There are many people who are interested in the results of this sort of analysis so it would be very good if you could publish your first set of data as soon as possible - even if its a "one-off download the zip" style process.
On 28 May 2013, at 18:29, Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > As part of Betterrev we'll be providing some public hosting, we're still a > few weeks from going live, but it shouldn't be too far away. We could then > provide a place to host these results on that server. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > > On 28 May 2013 13:55, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisn...@redhat.com> wrote: > > ----- Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > > > That would be fantastic. The place we're combining all the workflow for > > submitting patches to OpenJDK is the Betterrev project --> > > https://bitbucket.org/adoptopenjdk/betterrev. Also see > > adoptopenjdk.java.net for the mailing list and IRC details. > > > > Hi Martijn, > > thank you very much for the info mentioned above. > What should I do to present Mauve code coverage results somewhere publicly > available? > > Cheers, > Pavel > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > > > On 24 May 2013 16:37, Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisn...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > FYI: we are running many form of tests against OpenJDK internally in Red > > > Hat. > > > ATM our focus is to improve especially Mauve tests to have better coverage > > > of all Java SE API classes. > > > I'm also measuring test code coverage using JaCoCo and my own JVM TI based > > > tool which is > > > able to check code coverage on basic classes (where JaCoCo can't be used). > > > All results > > > are generated in HTML form + some graphs etc. etc. > > > > > > It would be perfect to have one (public) place to publish those results, > > > so it would be nice to cooperate on this topic if you want to :) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Pavel Tisnovsky > > > Red Hat > > > > >
