On 10/12/2013 16:39, Balchandra Vaidya wrote:
:
In the subset of the tests I have been running, it appears only one
test [1]
is failing with agentvm option. I will try to run other tests in client
groups [Note: I will update the instruction to use jtreg groups with b119
results posting] and see what tests can be run in agentvm mode, but
main issue
in those remaining client tests are some tests may not consistently
produce
same results - could stabilizing those tests be a goal for jdk9 repo ?
If the tests are unstable then it is pointless running them. Do you know
if there are bugs submitted for these issues? If so then it would be
good to add the "teststablization" label so that they can be tracked.
Also if it doesn't look like the issues can be fixed quickly then
excluding the tests (either by @ignore or the ProblemList.txt if they
only need to be excluded on some platforms) would be good so that others
don't waste time running them.
I think it would be great to have a goal to get these tests stable in
the jdk9 forest. I don't know how much effort you have to put into it
but it would be good to at least get some handle on the extent of the issue.
-Alan.
