On 12/12/2013 14:12, Volker Simonis wrote:
:
What about having jdk_stable_headless, jdk_stable_headfull and
jdk_stable_all beeing the union of these two?
We could, assuming it isn't too much effort to maintain.
There are a few cases where the effort to get the tests to pass when
headless shouldn't be too much and I'd have a preference to just doing
that rather than listing individual tests in the group definitions. The
beans tests are one example when they almost all pass when headless and
it looks like there are only 10-12 that would need a small update to
work headless.
-Alan.
