Hey Chris, Jitwatch is one of the ones I'm very happy to keep at cloudbees since its closely aligned / came out of this group :-)
Cheers, Martijn On Monday, 26 October 2015, Chris Newland <cnewl...@chrisnewland.com> wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > I'm fine if you want to drop JITWatch from the Adopt cloudbees. > > I'll start building it on my VPS that already bakes nightlies for OpenJFX > / JDK 8 / JDK 9. > > Probably a good idea as now I can build+test against the bleeding edge and > report back to quality outreach. > > Cheers, > > Chris > @chriswhocodes > > > On Sat, October 24, 2015 21:58, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > > We have a list of projects that we were building against the latest Java > > 8 > > and Java 9 binaries: > > > > https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/ > > > > > > This list is pretty much superseded but the quality outreach efforts and > > it's also unrealistic for us to maintain the builds for other OSS > projects > > (they should just have their own CI). > > > > > > I'm looking to get this cleaned up. I'm looking for volunteer(s) to help > > me contact each of the projects on the cloudbees list, assist them in > > getting a nightly build set up on their own CI and get them to contact > > Rory > > and his quality group to be added to that matrix. > > > > I estimate that there's only ~40 projects to migrate, so hopefully only a > > few each if we get enough volunteers (hint, hint) :-). > > > > We'll then keep the cloudbees instance for building OpenJDK binaries for > > various esoteric forests as well as the OpenJDK tools as that fits our > > Adoption remit far better. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Martijn > > > > > > > -- Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)
