On 03/01/2016 09:01, John Patrick wrote:
cheers for the history Alan.

I wasn't sure if 9-ea was going to be used purely during early access or if a new structure was going to be used.

is their a source file, java doc or mail list message detailing the changes or new Java 9 setup. So I can reference that in any potential change I submit to open source projects?

looking at the submitted patch, am I right to assume java.version going forward will be the purely a display string value and java.specification.version should be used to work out the major version number. Should I also assume their will be a java.implementation.version if you need to know the low level build number.

Best to start with JEP 223 [1]. I've no doubt that the Maven maintainers are aware of the changes, it just might take a while to address issues in code that parses the version string.

-Alan

[1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/223

Reply via email to