Hi Vitaly,
Looking into these , will get back to you.
Rgds,Rory
On 22/12/2016 08:50, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
The same issues with
- https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168294
- https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025083
They were closed as a duplicate of some bugs - there are no
information in the Links section (or it is inaccessible)
On 22 Dec 2016, at 09:25, Vitaly Provodin
<vitaly.provo...@jetbrains.com
<mailto:vitaly.provo...@jetbrains.com>> wrote:
Hi Rory,
Now it is accessed. But the issue JDK-8168389 has resolution=‘Cannot
Reproduce’ for now, before it was ‘Duplicate’
Is that correct?
Thanks,
Vitaly
On 21 Dec 2016, at 21:10, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com
<mailto:rory.odonn...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi Vitaly,
You should be able to view the bug now, I am still looking into it.
Rgds,Rory
On 21/12/2016 10:26, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
Ooops. I do not have an access to JDK-8072110 - Bug System requires
me to log in (but I do not have an account yet)
Does the issue JDK-8072110 have some restrictions?
On 21 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonn...@oracle.com
<mailto:rory.odonn...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Hi Vitaly,
I will look into this, the duplicate bug is JDK-8072110 - which
was closed as "will not fix".
I will look into this further, but at this time of year it may
take some time.
Rgds,Rory
On 21/12/2016 04:25, Vitaly Provodin wrote:
Good time of day
Recently I detected that the issue
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168389 was closed as
duplicate but there are no information about original bug.
Could you pleas provide information about what bug was duplicated
by JDK-8168389 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168389>?
Thanks,
Vitaly
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
