Yeah, we definitely need to fix this for Grizzly. I think the hang up on the review is a question over whether the allocation of a specific IP address also requires a change to lock the DB.
Bob, I think that's a good question regarding VLAN allocation. My guess is that this would also be impacted. It seems like current developer of the patch is non-responsive, as they haven't replied to comments from Feb 19th, so probably best if we have a core team member take over the change-set. Dan On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Robert Kukura <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/04/2013 04:01 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > I personally am in favor of moving this one forward. > > Do we need similar DB locking in the linuxbridge, openvswitch, and > hyperv plugins for the transactions that allocate VLAN tags and tunnel > IDs from pools? > > -Bob > > > Thanks > > Gary > > > > On 03/04/2013 10:28 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The code review for this bug > >> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1110807 - > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21424/4) has seen no activity in the > >> last week. > >> The bug is marked as high, and is also marked for backporting. > >> The patch works for me, but I still see a couple of -1s on the review. > >> I wonder if we should approve this patch as it is, or defer everything > >> to havana (Isaku created a blueprint for addressing race conditions) > >> > >> Salvatore > >> > > > > > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~quantum-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
