A few years ago I replaced the piston rings on my Ferriday 2.0 CVH and was told the pistons were from an Ital. Also noticed the the original holes for the sierra sump were plugged and redrilled for a transverse sump.
Mark On 13 Dec 2011, at 09:19, "Russell Willcox" <[email protected]> wrote: > If I remember the pistons are out of something else (Rover?) with pockets > machined to clear the valves but I could be wrong. As I said mine has 2.0 > cast into the block but I always thought the CC was 1818. > > Russell > > On 12/12/2011 21:55, Dave the Subbie wrote: >> >> I'm pretty sure the oil filter is in the normal CVH place. If he used >> a 1.8 Sierra sump gasket, I would have thought that wouldn't fit a >> ZVH? >> >> I did wonder about taking the plugs out turning one cylinder to TDC, >> topping it up with oil through the plug hole, then turning it to BDC >> and seeing how much more it took, as a crude way of measuring the cc >> without taking the head off. Would be a bit messy syphoning it out >> again, but would save a head gasket and set of stretch bolts. In fact, >> if it did turn out to be a US engine, the gasket and bolt set might >> take a little sourcing. >> >> I wonder if I could tell anything from looking through the plug holes >> at the piston crowns. The Sierra's are very different to the 1.6's. >> Any ideas what the US ones looked like? >> >> I have loads of receipts, including the original receipts for the kit, >> and there's no mention of the engine, so I assume this is a later >> addition. It's still registered as a 1.6. Is the car known to the >> club? Red Coupe, black bonnet, E186EHD? Awfully tatty, but lots of >> fancy bits, so was obviously someone's pride and joy when built. >> >> Thanks for the help >> >> Dave. >> >> On Dec 12, 9:07 pm, Jim Hearne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The engine capacity is normally where you say the 20 is on the front of >>> the block, certainly on later CVH's and Zetec's >>> The Sierra block i had said 1.8 there. >>> The early FWD CVH heads also had the cross hatch marks. >>> >>> The easy way to tell if it's really a CVH rather than a ZVH (Zetc block, >>> CVH head), where is the oil filter. >>> If it's on the back of the block under then inlet manifold then it's a >>> CVH, if it's hung off the oil pump at the bottom corner of the engine >>> then it's a ZVH. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> On 12/12/2011 20:13, Dave the Subbie wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> General Knowledge, Starter for 10: >>>> I've just bought a red Coupe, no Q-061, nominally for spares, but it >>>> may get fixed up some day. Anyway, the seller thought it had a 2.0 CVH >>>> engine in it, but I'm not sure. The question is how can I tell easily? >>>> I know that Quantum did have access to US-spec 2.0 engines, as they >>>> were mentioned in some brochures, and in the Top Gear article on the >>>> 2+2. But do I have one? >>>> The seller based his assumption on the fact that the 1600 sump gasket >>>> didn't fit, only the one from the 1.8 Sierra, and that the block has >>>> "20" cast into the front face, just below the middle two exhaust >>>> ports. For what it's worth, it has a BP285 cam fitted and a >>>> rectangular-top Weber, like the one on the early XR2s. The head has >>>> the cross-hatch marks cast into it, like the Sierra head. The >>>> distributor and thermostat housing are as per Fiesta, and there is no >>>> Timing Belt Cover. >>>> Now, I have a couple of Sierra 1.8 engines in the shed, and one of >>>> them has "27" cast into the block, in the same place as the "20" on >>>> this one. So I suspect that is just a batch mark. Personally, I >>>> suspect it's a Sierra unit that someone has converted to FWD and, >>>> maybe done some tuning on. I've heard it running, but never driven it, >>>> so it's hard to say what sort of power it has. >>>> So, is there any easy way that I can tell what it is? I know the 1.8 >>>> is taller than the 1.6, but what about the 2.0? Are there any >>>> distinctive differences between the US and UK engines? Do the casting >>>> marks mean anything? Will the Engine No. tell me anything? >>>> I know I can take the head off and know for sure, but it's cold and I >>>> have a lot of other things to do. Any ideas, anyone, please? >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dave. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a été contrôlé par l'anti-virus mail. >> Aucun virus connu à ce jour par nos services n'a été détecté >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4676 - Release Date: 12/12/11 >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Quantum Owners Group" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en > > IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" > basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum > Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in > the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any > person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged > to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this > or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
