A more specific question--is all the Java support and overhead present when i use QC, evenif I have no use for it?
The support is there, probably lazily loaded (so not really, unless something makes use of it). memory-wise, the same -- likely not loaded unless something else touches it. Core Image filters do a bit with javascript, so that may cause it to get loaded etc.
As for CPU overhead, none at all -- QC doesn't appear to have any per- frame dependance upon JS aside from the JS patch (a good thing ;). It's loaded via the ExtraPatches.plugin bundle. with CoreImage filters, I'm not sure whether or not that's evaluated by default (I've not profiled/inspected that aspect of filtering) -- but if you make a more elaborate filter function, it's almost certainly evaluated per- frame. :(
-- [ christopher wright ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kineme.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
