of course. always so obvious when you see it looking you in the face!

and double thanks as the comp i was making needed the extra-fu of the kineme shell command patch over the qc example command line patch.

hot off the press: 
http://web.mac.com/tobyspark/tobyzstuff/tobyzblog/Entries/2008/8/3_photomatic.html

toby

On 4 Aug 2008, at 01:15, Christopher Wright wrote:

But switching that round won't execute in any form I've thought of so far, but the GUI adapts as you'd expect.
function (__number outputNumber[2]) main (__number inputNumber)
{
        var result = new Object();
        result.outputNumber[0] = inputNumber;
        result.outputNumber[1] = inputNumber;
        return result;
}
Am I missing something blindingly obvious, or attempting the "unpossible"?



function (__number outputNumber[2]) main(__number inputNumber)
{
        var result = new Object();
        result.outputNumber = new Array(2);
        result.outputNumber[0] = inputNumber;
        result.outputNumber[1] = inputNumber;
        return result;
}

Don't forget to allocate arrays before you assign values to them :)

--
[ christopher wright ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kineme.net/


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list      (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to