On this note, has there been a rdar for renaming published inputs without
breaking them, as well as changing published order?

-George Toledo

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Christopher Wright <
christopher_wri...@apple.com> wrote:

> > Make a few patches within a macro within a macro within a macro (ha),
> like iterator, render in image etc. Publish a few outputs to the parent
> patches and up through your macro 'graph' to the top most patch. Within one
> of the sub macros other than parent, decide you want to encapsulate
> something into a new macro (say for organizational purposes), and all of a
> sudden your published ports are no longer published, forcing you to
> re-publish them tediously. This has to be a bug right? I can feel my sanity
> wither away. :)
>
> known bug: <rdar://problem/5905075>  (and oldie from the looks of it).
>
> > I have some suggestions regarding publishing, etc.
> >       When you control click/right click on a patch and select "Publish
> inputs" or "Publish Outputs", can we have a that check next to the items be
> triggerable for more than one?
> >               ie: select "Publish Inputs", get a contextual menu of more
> than one item. Be able to click on multiple items to enable the checkbox and
> thus publish all of them from within the one menu. This would save enourmous
> amounts of time, and also give the user a choice in what to publish and not,
> unlike the Kineme work around which, iirc, publishes all input ports.
> >       Add an additional menu option underneath Publish Inputs / Outputs,
> which would be "Propagate all published inputs to top level patch" (as well
> as outputs), similar to Kinemes addition. For those of us who have to work
> without Kineme for various reasons, its a real loss, and ought to be within
> the QC Editor Proper.
>
> publish-to-root functionality is <rdar://problem/5147904> (even older than
> the above!)
>
> Note that suggestions on-list are not the same a feature requests at
> http://bugreporter.apple.com -- please remember to file things there once
> you feel the idea is sufficiently discussed/refined.
>
> This is a topic that has some already-known radars, but getting a really
> refined set of what needs to happen would be a great thing to have discussed
> some for a future version of QC.  Both of these radars were also filed
> internally, so no one outside has bothered to do so from the looks of it
> (neither have and significant duplicates from external users).
>
> PS: In kinemecore you can do "publish all inputs" and then hit esc to _not_
> publish a given input when the publish name editor pops up for that port.
>  It's kludgy, but the best I could do without really breaking stuff :)
>
> --
> Christopher Wright
> christopher_wri...@apple.com
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list      (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/gtoledo3%40gmail.com
>
> This email sent to gtole...@gmail.com
>
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list      (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to