On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, vade <dokt...@mac.com> wrote: > Is this consistent across 32 and 64 bit QC Editor environments on 10.7 ? > > What about older runtimes, like 10.6? > > I'm checking the project, and found another level of detail.
If I flip the order of one item in my attributesForPropertyPortWithKey, stuff becomes unpredictable, and it no longer lists "last = top", but first = bottom stayed consistent. With some more fiddling, it seems that if the attributesForPropertyPortWithKey, AND that the @dynamic properties are listed in the same order, my plugin restores with ports in the expected order in 10.6 and 10.7, 32 and 64 bit. I did compile in SL, not Lion. This test also had the interface listed in the same order. I didn't test to see if the interface order matters (as in, I didn't fiddle and make one in a different order to see what would happen), I just went ahead and made it match the @ dynamic and attributesForPropertyPortWithKey orders, so it may not have to match, for whatever that's worth. I don't know. On Jul 26, 2011, at 7:36 PM, George Toledo wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:23 PM, vade <dokt...@mac.com> wrote: > >> Im fairly certain this is a known issue, but it appears 10.7 has 3rd party >> input port ordering issues when running in 64 bit mode, not respecting the >> output of >> >> + (NSArray*) sortedPropertyPortKeys; >> >> However running in 32 bit mode seems fine. >> >> Is this fixable via some preference or cache cleansing I have not found, >> or a re-compile? >> >> Filed as bug: 9845407 >> >> Thanks. >> > > I don't really think you want to hear this, and am guessing you probably > already know this, but for the sake of other readers, and out of curiosity > to see if you get the same results: > > Upon Lion, when building QCPlugins, I've abandoned the sortedPropertyKeys > and when I setup: > > + (NSDictionary*) attributesForPropertyPortWithKey:(NSString*)key > > I list everything so that the port I want to be at the top is listed last, > to the port at the bottom being listed first. I've only tested this with *one > plugin build, *but results seemed consistent, and correct, as opposed to > using the sortedPropertPortKeys method. So, that *may* work. > > > -- > George Toledo > gtole...@gmail.com > www.georgetoledo.com > > > > -- George Toledo gtole...@gmail.com www.georgetoledo.com
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
