On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:29:41AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > [...] Ok, this (and that Xen don't care about kexec) means we don't want to > do this.
I'm worried that they didn't follow up on the report from 2008. It does make me question how many users kexec into new kernels. > [...] Using kexec from Linux > payload of Coreboot may be really cool, but not for large variety of > hardware. There is nothing special about the Linux kernel or kexec binary I'm using. Those are both stock; the two line Xen patch skip the EBDA probe is the only custom code. Perhaps if it were wrapped up to be part of the 'no-real-mode' command line option they would merge it (although the probe happens prior to command line parsing right now). -- Trammell -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/20161104084811.GW12784%40chishio.swcp.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
