On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Ouellet <[email protected]> wrote: > Even if XenGT works great, I would not like to see it adopted in Qubes > unless it is throughout audited (which...
Although, I could see a legitimate argument for the other side: One might argue that the set of people whose daily work truly requires 3d acceleration would be better served by using Qubes with holes in it due to XenGT than whatever other monolithic system they use today, and as long as it is off by default and comes with appropriately scary warning labels attached, including it would be a net positive. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/CABQWM_D72Kdb6yn28U9D94o5s9gHCAYSOpFQ-3eYrwnADXywvQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
