On 12/05/2016 02:50 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
> There are also still a couple of rough edges during installation/first
> run. For
> example "LVM thin" storage should be used, but currently it needs to be
> selected manually (using custom partitioning option). And depending on
> the disk
> layout, it may require creating those partitions manually.
>
Honestly, it would be so much better if Qubes OS did NOT use LVM, and
used btrfs or ZFS instead. LVM has no protection whatsoever against
data corruption. I hope the APIs are modular such that there is an
implementable interface for storage backends which does not assume LVM
is the only thing that underlies the system. As a person using Qubes OS
on top of ZFS, I would find myself in quite some trouble if that was not
the case.
--
Rudd-O
http://rudd-o.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/47b930e6-c409-cf2e-4a1d-e7be6496c42c%40rudd-o.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
