> On 15. May 2017, at 04:21, Andrew David Wong adw-at-qubes-os.org 
> |qubes-mailing-list/Example Allow| <a4dhg0e...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
>> On 2017-05-14 20:57, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Andrew David Wong <a...@qubes-os.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 2017-05-13 18:21, Peter Todd wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:18:39PM -0500, Andrew David Wong wrote:
>>>>> There are many other methods you could use to attempt to verify the
>>>>> master key fingerprint aside from relying on the Qubes website. Here's
>>>>> a brief, non-exhaustive list:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Use different search engines to search for the fingerprint.
>>>>> * Use Tor to view and search for the fingerprint on various websites.
>>>>> * Use various VPNs and proxy servers.
>>>>> * Use different Wi-Fi networks (work, school, internet cafe, etc.).
>>>>> * Ask people to post the fingerprint in various forums and chat rooms.
>>>>> * Check against PDFs and photographs in which the fingerprint appears
>>>>>   (e.g., slides from a talk or on a T-shirt).
>>>>> * Repeat all of the above from different computers and devices.
>>>> 
>>>> Don't forget the PGP web-of-trust.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Good point. Added.
>>> 
>>>> For me personally this is a very short trust path with multiple 
>>>> connections.
>>>> For example:
>>>> 
>>>> 1) my PGP key is 0x7FAB114267E4FA04
>>>> 2) I've signed Nicolas Vigier (boklm)'s key, IIRC after a keysigning a few
>>>>   years back at a Tor conference.
>>>> 3) Nicolas Vigier has signed the Qubes Master Signing Key.
>>>> 
>>>> Which you can see here: 
>>>> https://pgp.cs.uu.nl/paths/7fab114267e4fa04/to/2067001b1b678a63.html
>>>> 
>>>> A few more paths:
>>>> 
>>>> Me to Ola Bini:      
>>>> https://pgp.cs.uu.nl/mk_path.cgi?FROM=7FAB114267E4FA04&TO=295c746984af7f0c&PATHS=trust+paths
>>>> Me to Holger Levsen: 
>>>> https://pgp.cs.uu.nl/mk_path.cgi?FROM=7FAB114267E4FA04&TO=091AB856069AAA1C&PATHS=trust+paths
>>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately the tools to actually find these paths all kinda suck, but 
>>>> they
>>>> do at least the paths exist. The one I used to find the above is
>>>> https://pgp.cs.uu.nl/, however it has the significant limitation that it 
>>>> only
>>>> works for keys in the "strong set" - the Qubes signing key is *not* in 
>>>> that set
>>>> because it has never signed another key that is in that set.
>>>> 
>>>> IMO the Qubes project should fix this.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> It's unclear to me whether there's any practical way to perform such a
>>> signing without exposing the QMSK to unacceptable risk. Joanna wrote [1]
>>> that the QMSK was generated on an airgapped machine and that the private
>>> key has never left that machine (and hopefully never will). I infer from
>>> context that this refers to a physically (as opposed to virtually)
>>> airgapped machine. Since the QMSK was generated there (and, presumably,
>>> Release Signing Keys (RSKs) are also generated there), this entails that
>>> some GPG-like program (probably GPG itself) is installed in whatever OS
>>> is running on that machine. Let's refer to this as QMSK's "environment."
>>> 
>>> Clearly, both the QMSK and RSK public keys get transferred off of the
>>> airgapped machine somehow, since we have copies of them. I assume that
>>> such transfers are only one-way and are tightly controlled. That is,
>>> only public keys are allowed to leave the QMSK's environment, and
>>> nothing is allowed to enter. In particular, it's safe to assume that
>>> there is no networking (or else it wouldn't be an air gap) and that no
>>> freely rewritable USB drives (i.e., drives without write-protect
>>> switches) are plugged into that machine. (This is inferred from the fact
>>> that Joanna was warning the world about the dangers of plugging USB
>>> devices into machines years before BadUSB.) This suggests that some kind
>>> of read-only medium is used to enforce the one-way transfers.
>>> 
>>> If all this is correct, then the only way for the QMSK to sign another
>>> key is to:
>>> 
>>>  (1) Generate the key in the QMSK's environment;
>>>  (2) Transfer the key to the QMSK's environment.
>>> 
>>> (1) is the method used to create RSKs, but it's not clear whether this
>>> would help with getting the QMSK into the strong set. Would it be
>>> sufficient for the QMSK to generate a key that subsequently enters the
>>> strong set? Even so, this would introduce new complications to the Qubes
>>> PGP trust model. For example, should the strong set key generated by the
>>> QMSK be considered just as trustworthy as the QMSK itself? Should it be
>>> used to verify RSKs and Qubes ISOs? If not, can such accidental misuse
>>> be prevented, and if so, by what means should that be enforced?
>>> 
>>> (2), meanwhile, requires transferring the key to the QMSK's environment
>>> via:
>>> 
>>>  (3) The network;
>>>  (4) A storage medium;
>>>  (5) Manual input.
>>> 
>>> Let's assume that (5) would be too cumbersome and error-prone to qualify
>>> as "practical." (3) would, again, entail that the machine is no
>>> longer airgapped. (4) is inherently risky. The riskiest storage media
>>> are, presumably, those with rewritable firmware, such as many
>>> conventional USB drives. Even with less risky media (e.g., CD-ROMs or
>>> even floppy disks), however, we can't rule out the possibility that a
>>> malformed PGP public key block might try to exploit a hypothetical
>>> vulnerability in GPG. So, in general, (2) may not be worth the risk.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] 
>>> https://www.qubes-os.org/security/verifying-signatures/#importing-qubes-signing-keys
>> 
>> Uhh... except it *has* signed other keys, for example:
>> 
>> $ gpg2 --list-sigs marmarek
>> pub   rsa4096 2014-03-05 [SC]
>>      0064428F455451B3EBE78A7F063938BA42CFA724
>> uid           [ unknown] Marek Marczykowski-Górecki (Qubes OS signing
>> key) <marma...@invisiblethingslab.com>
>> sig 3        063938BA42CFA724 2014-03-05  Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
>> (Qubes OS signing key) <marma...@invisiblethingslab.com>
>> sig          EE570349A603BCB6 2014-03-05  Marek Marczykowski (Qubes OS
>> signing key) <marma...@invisiblethingslab.com>
>> sig          DDFA1A3E36879494 2014-04-30  Qubes Master Signing Key
>> sig 3        063938BA42CFA724 2014-04-30  Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
>> (Qubes OS signing key) <marma...@invisiblethingslab.com>
>> 
> 
> Oh, wow! That raises some questions about the way the QMSK is handled.

Not if those keys were generated and signed in the QMSK-Environment before they 
were transferred to their owners, right?

> 
>> This is the reason we can initially import only the master signing
>> key, trust it, and have all other valid Qubes signing keys trusted
>> transitively. This is done for example here [1].
>> 
>> [1]: 
>> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-builder/blob/3352cd4363a25debd77ced0a1fa752944ac1ef2f/scripts/verify-git-tag#L25
>> 
> 
> - -- 
> Andrew David Wong (Axon)
> Community Manager, Qubes OS
> https://www.qubes-os.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZGRDFAAoJENtN07w5UDAwB6AQAJciK2nVcGtbRtqv6JGUK46V
> 42y3xfUtSk45lP/ABtUdmwXWuDVTOfq8qFoK5AuBScmZEeihzbxum1lsyPNwghGz
> zEM7oleroio23a+Jbfhv0JGWMFfQBQQ5Z+F19X0aT2UPq6c5WMHdWyPU2N5OSlAM
> rrCYjc+WEmiOhKJSiMmns1zlC1R/mUejR/xzdAMaG9WxLm/hKPxtVtFcuKfUfFVe
> xgHUOBh++n7OVism4/g9kCaoecYtEFZoz/r3AE75T0UOl4fe4U+KCvmRnXZzz6v2
> eQWgpNbCAVEy+cMq/bfEQKrC1jbDxVpP3llIj42JRuRjdxv1i3ZKP2YaBMH/tXHG
> Nsxzzd6lXdx0ODbsroV+iZohKGZqRJvSy+L7NOCuTCgL/1xB/FcnLBynncw4CQlG
> rTPgd1tankyHenhPmoQuZuqOjvZx4aWIHqRRrsPIJjPvIidgknBpahjedzx8spmN
> PSW52INkuesSCZGd5T3Y2AZVTr5o82XfdIKLeKKhwnBf5rPW9TjyKhDVl15sPniJ
> AwOVvWWpPwdxKthZfNT5P6zK5lgofuqC5BiZAmDbI6TO+Wh7Ja06/uhyNLg5p7Cr
> o4rtDoBKDQfEBIEJCQbm/t9ZAmf25Gher3DLB4U56sIjZEgn3yow6BdhliTEgyzu
> FRBnrHuxtYkHSr6pxSdt
> =XrqU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "qubes-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to qubes-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to qubes-devel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/357f5e92-5e60-ab8c-5426-38dc4b0e3b06%40qubes-os.org.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-devel@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/20727-1495267329-64823%40sneakemail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to