On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 07:30:04AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > > While at it - is it better to name it qubes-nautilus or > > > > qubes-core-agent-nautilus? > > > > > > I think the latter is definitly better than the former, but maybe > > > rather qubes-vm-filemanager-support-(kde|gnome) ? > > Renamed to qubes-core-agent-nautilus. > > I've also renamed Fedora package to qubes-core-agent, so both Debian and > Fedora packages have the same name. yay!
> > > maybe it's now time to update #2771 and put the above thoughts as a list
> > > there?
>
> Added some of them there.
>
> Additional ideas:
> - qubes-core-agent-network - all kind of network setup - not needed if
> only offline VMs are used from such template
> - include also updates proxy stuff (and dependency on tinyproxy for
> this reason)
> - qubes-core-agent-network-manager - mostly useful for NetVM (depends
> on qubes-core-agent-network and NetworkManager)
what's the diff between the two?
> I've done some of it already in separate branch[1]. Interesting part
> (new content in debian/control):
>
> Package: qubes-core-agent-nautilus
> Package: qubes-core-agent-dom0-updates
> Package: qubes-core-agent-network
> Package: qubes-core-agent-network-manager
ok, (looks good,) so the latter is only needed for sys-net(s), basically?
maybe qubes-core-agent-network_ing_(-support) and
qubes-core-agent-network-manager?
or maybe I'm just overly pedantic here… :-)
--
cheers,
Holger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/20170529234437.GA15554%40layer-acht.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
