On 01/23/18 16:05, 'Tom Zander' via qubes-devel wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 05:56:05 CET Chris Laprise wrote:
But at some point the hardware will make or break us, and the
hardware we got now is Wintel; even Linux is an afterthought when you're
not looking at server components.
I'm not sure if you guys caught the subtle side-effects of the 'Qubes-Air'
proposal. It didn't hit me until I slept on it.
yep - the same thing occurred to me this morning after yesterday's post,
when I thought "hmm, they ended up drinking the cloud kool-aid like
everybody else"...
I don't think I'll ever use Qubes in the cloud as I'm often in places
where I can't rely on a good internet connection but being able to
locally and securely use different hardware platforms for different
workloads/usage opens a whole new world of use cases. (I liked the idea
of a dumb microcontroller for the vault VM).
One thing I'm not sure about though is how the "networked" qubes rpc
will be secured (attack surface of the tcp implementation and/or higher
protocols encapsulating rpc, ...).
Ivan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/aa52a819-0280-b7c2-480d-688e33459664%40maa.bz.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
