On Thu, February 8, 2018 4:50 pm, Ivan Mitev wrote: > > IMHO a public wiki - official or not - should not replace the current > documentation: someone may add unsecure instructions (willingly or not) > and there will always be users who blindingly copy/paste instructions.
That and divergence between the two sets of documentation, possibly by neglecting one or the other. > My idea behind a public wiki was to have a "staging" area that would > lower the bar for writing official documentation (eg. understanding pull > requests isn't needed), as well as easing "community" testing/debugging > (like providing workarounds or step-by-step instructions like now with > Windows HVMs). This sounds good; should avoid divergence. > If after some time the instructions are deemed good > enough, then they could be pulled into the official docs and removed from > the wiki. Will you be handling that step by submitting PRs against the official docs? How frequently? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/ec574595f27d4bf164c93297fcb55be1.squirrel%40tt3j2x4k5ycaa5zt.onion. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.