On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:36:13AM +0000, 'Zaz Brown' via qubes-devel wrote:
> If so, it might be worth publicizing the move more widely, because there > seems to be a vague understanding among community developers that SALT > is the "proper" way to do things. E.g. Arkenoi's Liteqube fork states > translating everything to SALT as a pre-1.0 goal. > https://github.com/arkenoi/liteqube In the current state of things salt IS the "proper" way, and will remain so for some time. > I'm sure I'm not the only dev out there who's been getting frustrated > playing around with SALT and would be more than willing to test Ansible. It would help if you explained what the source of your frustration is, and so what could be improved. In my experience, most users are able to get a grip on using salt fairly quickly, and I dont see why "devs" should find this more difficult. -- I never presume to speak for the Qubes team. When I comment in the mailing lists I speak for myself. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/aAwqSLWGhTiMhKUX%40thirdeyesecurity.org.
