-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 26-02-23 10:22:58, qubist wrote: > A minimal template is not a usability tool. Marek nailed it earlier: > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:33:04 +0100 Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > as minimal as possible, while still allowing reasonable easy > > customization > > So far, nobody has explained how exactly removing all the listed > packages (optionally keeping xterm and e.g. nano) will make the minimal > template worse or harder to customize.
I agree with the proposal of having a very minimal OS. I do not agree with removing packages from existing systems. I understand unman's point that it will increase support calls, I think that supporters should point out that it is for advanced users, rather than trying to help others. I believe minimal templates are best leveraged with orchestration tools. Now back to the point of defining how minimal it is, I agree with Marek's point of a minimal system: - - being as minimal as it can be - - having orchestration tools installed by default I don't think xterm is necessary give qvm-console-dispvm. It is not the perfect solution yet as the management console window does not inform which qube it is connected to [0]. [0] https://github.com/qubesos/qubes-issues/issues/9810 - -- Benjamin Grande -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQRklnEdsUUe50UmvUUbcxS/DMyWhwUCaZ8tMQAKCRAbcxS/DMyW h/KDAQCTRAJPNiElEX/WtzgAynWjsTyf8SBTc7jOX1SZqBsVjwEAukaZlrZReKkR I4NRfppRGmyWhkGATvAGQFsBEdG0owA= =WZcm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/aZ8tMn4s_z4n5x6o%40b7Fe-Zjc.
