On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 8:20:29 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 12:34:29 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > > He also just had a recent issue with one of his patches that was totally > > borked and suspect and blocked everyone from the grsec twitter account out > > of shame. > > wow thanks for the information,and yes I totally agree there will never be a > way to be fully 100% a system is unexploitable,bug-free,backdoor free,all we > can really due is reduce the coding,and make it more simple > > for years projects such as firefox,OpenBSD,gresecurity,etc. have been > constantly updating their respective projects,i see no near possible end to > its security audits,in the fore see-able future. > > and i did not know Brad Spengler does'nt use his own kernel :O I did hear > though he was quite disrespectful when a certain someone found a bug and he > got butt-hurt or something and deleted that certain someone off his twitter > > and the escalation protections is not needed why?just wondering is all,I have > a hunch it is because of Qubes awesome security by isolation approach,and > because its based off a micro-kernel Xen right?due to its small amounts of > coding?
He blocked everyone off his twitter, he flies off the handle alot it seems. Well I'm no expert, but for example qubes has passwordless sudo. But maybe i'm misunderstanding myself I'm not sure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/c3139eb5-b677-4edf-8ef1-a92efdabf78d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
